76 F
Cruz Bay
Friday, February 3, 2023
HomeNewsArchivesTax Revaluation Must Not Be Imposed Before 2008

Tax Revaluation Must Not Be Imposed Before 2008

Dear Source:
Neither Del. Christensen's office nor any media publication I have read has explained how a huge crisis is to be resolved with retroactive property tax revaluation.
Retroactive revaluation–assessing a different (presumably increased) tax for property in years past–creates a crisis with property which has changed ownership during the period covered by the revaluation, including transfers to be completed in 2007. Taxes are prorated at closing based on the previous year's tax bill. (None of us has the 2006 tax bill, so presumably the 2005 tax bill would be used.) Pro-rating at closing (the date when title passes) assumes that the tax bill for the year in which title passes will be the same as in the previous year. If no tax bill reflecting the correct, changed amount is issued until after the property closes, the buyer will have been short-changed on the amount of prorated taxes credited, and the seller will have received a windfall by not being charged the additional amount of taxes for the time the seller owned the property. In short, these changes, which could not have been anticipated when the contracts were executed, materially and substantially affect contracts for the purchase and sale of real estate. No one has been able to explain how this problem is to be addressed.
Escrowing a greater amount at the time of closing does not adequately address the problem because there is no reasonable basis upon which to estimate the increased amount to be escrowed, and there has been no reasonable assumption for the past several years that revaluation would be forthcoming, for example, within twelve months of closing.
In order to avoid this crisis, the legislature should provide that no increases can take effect retroactively. The increases should be effective, at the earliest, in 2008.
I have never before lived in a jurisdiction in which property tax bills are issued retroactively.
I implore readers of the Source to respond with information concerning this very important matter. This is not a rhetorical question, nor is it asked for the mere amusement of Open Forum readers.
Impatiently Awaiting Answers

Dena Langdon
St. Thomas

Editor's note: We welcome and encourage readers to keep the dialogue going by responding to Source commentary. Letters should be e-mailed with name and place of residence to source@viaccess.net.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Keeping our community informed is our top priority.
If you have a news tip to share, please call or text us at 340-228-8784.

Support local + independent journalism in the U.S. Virgin Islands

Unlike many news organizations, we haven't put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as accessible as we can. Our independent journalism costs time, money and hard work to keep you informed, but we do it because we believe that it matters. We know that informed communities are empowered ones. If you appreciate our reporting and want to help make our future more secure, please consider donating.