Home Breaking News Wayne James Corruption Trial Postponed Again

Wayne James Corruption Trial Postponed Again

193
Court Won't Dismiss Sen. Wayne James's Corruption Case; Trial Begins Nov. 6
Court Won't Dismiss Sen. Wayne James's Corruption Case; Trial Begins Nov. 6
Wayne James conducts a Senate hearing in 2009.
Wayne James conducts a Senate hearing in 2009.

The trial for former Sen. Wayne James on federal corruption charges has been postponed until 9 a.m. Jan. 8, pending the outcome of James’ most recent appeal of a U.S. District Court’s decision not to dismiss the charges.

If the appeal has not been decided by that time, the trial may be postponed again. If James succeeds in persuading the appellate court that Gomez interpreted the law wrong, the charges against him will be dismissed.

In October, District Court Judge Curtis Gomez rejected James’ motion to dismiss the charges.

Advertising (skip)



Elected to one term in 2008, James was a V.I. senator on St. Croix from January 2009 to January 2011.

A 2011 joint federal and local audit found an array of misuse of taxpayer funds. It recounted how an unnamed senator, later revealed to be James, received 12 cash advance checks totaling $93,914 in 2009 as payment to the Danish National Archives for research, scanning, reproduction and translation of historic documents. While the report did not mention James by name, James held a press conference announcing his research findings from his visits to the Danish National Archives, leaving little doubt who the senator in question was. (See “Wayne James Unearths New Info on ‘Fireburn’” in Related Links below.)

According to the audit, the senator never submitted any receipts or invoices, and never provided copies of the documents: one of the 12 checks was for $27,636. When asked about the advances, James said some of the cash is in safe deposit boxes outside of the territory.

“We interviewed the senator, who told us that he rescheduled the trip and was keeping the cash advance in an off-island safety deposit box. We later determined that the trip was never taken and the money was never returned. After our repeated inquiries and a meeting with the senate president, the senator returned the money in June 2010,” auditors wrote in a 2011 report signed by V.I. Inspector General Steven van Beverhoudt and U.S. Interior Department acting Inspector General Mary Kendall.

James vanished. A federal warrant was issued in October 2015. The former senator was arrested in July 2016 at a friend’s apartment in Nonantola, Italy, on federal corruption charges. He was extradited to the territory and after a brief incarceration, has been on house arrest for the past year.

The charges carry penalties of as much as 20 years in prison.

James’ attorneys filed for the charges to be dismissed, arguing that federal and V.I. law make James immune for arrest for activities during his term of office that are connected to his legislative activities. They argue James sponsored legislation commemorating V.I. historical events and used his research in Denmark in that legislation.

Gomez rejected that argument, citing cases that distinguished legislative acts from acts that were ordinarily criminal and not essentially legislative.

“Here, James is alleged to have double-billed for expenses, filed sham invoices, and converted government funds,” Gomez wrote in a memorandum opinion issued Oct. 26. “The court finds that obtaining cash advances or reimbursements and depositing them into a personal account, double-billing the legislature, or submitting invoices for work either completed prior to his senatorial term or not at all do not qualify as legislative acts,” he concluded, denying the motion.

James appealed Oct. 27, again asserting that the research he did constitutes legislative acts which are protected by immunity. As it stands right now, his appeal focuses on asserting that fact finding is a legislative act and does not address the “double billing,” “sham invoices” or converting government funds to personal use that Gomez references in his Oct. 26 opinion.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Support the VI Source

Unlike many news organizations, we haven't put up a paywall - we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. Our sites are more popular than ever, but advertising revenues are falling - so you can see why we could use your help. Our independent journalism costs time, money and hard work to keep you informed, but we do it because we believe that it matters. If everybody who appreciates our reporting efforts were to help fund it for as little as $1, our future would be much more secure. Thanks in advance for your support!