
Ana Elsa Osorio Benitez Dies at 89

Traffic Alert in Bovoni and Post Office Area Monday-Wednesday

Weekly Weather Forecast With Jesse Daley
STX Pride Parade Fills Christiansted with Color

For the seventh year, St. Croix’s small but mighty Pride parade brought the community’s LGBTQIA community and allies together for a celebration of love and solidarity in Christiansted.

The parade made its way up King Street at around 11 a.m. with a colorful column that included Cruzan Cowgirls on horseback as well as groups from Good Hope Country Day School, businesses like Umami Sushi, and CMCArts. Umami’s Heather Reedy, who was born and raised on the island, said that she was proud to attend Saturday’s parade with her coworkers.

“We always put a little flag up for June and everything, but this is something that’s really true to all of our hearts — whether you’re part of the community or not,” she said. “We all support the community.”

St. Croix’s first Pride parade, which swept through Frederiksted in 2018, was marred somewhat by expressions of intolerance on social media and during the parade itself. On Saturday, attendees credited the V.I. Police Department for their support in ensuring a safe, welcoming event.
“I’m just happy that it’s a safe space to do it in,” Reedy said. “And I wish it would grow even more.”

While Saturday’s parade was smaller than in previous years, St. Croix Pride president Imani Evans said a core group of attendees and supporters always turn out and have a good time.
“One of the big things right now is we’re always looking for more board members and more volunteers,” she said, adding that events are volunteer-based. “So we’re always looking for people who want to come and be a part of it.”

Pride Month started early on the Big Island. On May 28, CMCArts hosted an opening reception for “Conversations on Pride,” an exhibition celebrating freedom of expression and the territory’s LGBTQIA community. That was followed by an inaugural Pride rave party at Shupe’s on the Boardwalk on May 30 and bingo at Sion Farm Distillery on June 2. On Wednesday, Common Cents Pub hosted “Rainbow Karaoke.”
Evans said upcoming events include a “Flower Power” brunch at Sion Farm Distillery from 10 a.m.-2 p.m. Sunday, a movie night at Blues Backyard BBQ from 6-10 p.m. Thursday, a “Rainbow Recharge” day at Island Movement on June 13, and a bar crawl from 1-8 p.m. on June 14 in Frederiksted. St. Croix Pride is planning to put a bow on the month of celebration with a closing beach party and drag show at Sandcastle on the Beach on June 20.
Board of Elections Review of Candidate Appeals Halted by Loss of Quorum
On Friday, the Virgin Islands Board of Elections was forced to suspend its review of candidate appeals and qualification challenges after losing its quorum, delaying decisions on several matters involving candidates seeking office in the 2026 election cycle.
During the meeting, board members reviewed appeals and eligibility issues involving candidates for various offices, including delegate to Congress, governor and the Legislature. Discussions centered on whether certain candidates met statutory filing requirements and whether those challenging disqualification decisions should be granted hearings before the board.
The continued review of candidate appeals comes just days after the Board of Elections voted to maintain a single ballot for federal and territorial contests in the 2026 election cycle. That meeting was also marked by discussions over candidate eligibility, residency requirements, ballot access and election procedures, underscoring the growing number of election-related challenges facing officials ahead of the November election.
Those issues remained at the forefront as board members reviewed appeals and correspondence from candidates seeking offices. Members debated statutory filing requirements, notification procedures and whether candidates challenging disqualification decisions should be granted hearings before the board prior to any final determination.
One of the appeals discussed involved Delegate to Congress candidate James Weber, whose nomination papers were disqualified after election officials determined they had not been filed in accordance with statutory requirements. Supervisor of Elections Caroline Fawkes told the board that Virgin Islands law requires nomination papers to be filed with the Supervisor of Elections in the district where the candidate resides. Some members agreed the law was clear, while others questioned whether candidates should be given additional opportunities to correct filing issues or present their cases before the board.
Board member Harriet Mercer argued that candidates requesting hearings before the board should be given the opportunity to appear in person before a quorum of members prior to any final determination being made. Mercer cited Weber’s appeal letter, which requested “a hearing in person of the quorum of the members of the Board of Elections.”
Before the board could conclude its review of the pending appeals, however, members were informed that a quorum was no longer present.
“We don’t have a quorum, so we cannot proceed,” Chair Raymond Williams announced, bringing the proceedings to a halt.
The board subsequently recessed the meeting and agreed to reconvene on Monday at 10 a.m. to continue reviewing unresolved candidate matters. Because of the loss of quorum, no final action was taken on several appeals and qualification challenges that remained before the board.
The delayed decisions come as election officials continue preparations for the 2026 election cycle and work through a growing number of candidate disputes, procedural questions and election-related challenges ahead of the upcoming election.
Chocolate Hole Fix Imminent, Sewer Officials Say

Bipartisan Congressional Briefing Examines What ‘Consent of the Governed’ Means in U.S. Territories

As the United States prepares to mark its 250th birthday, Right to Democracy and a bipartisan group of lawmakers and territorial advocates, including from the Virgin Islands, gathered in Washington Thursday to brief congressional staff and other policy leaders on what “consent of the governed” means for people in U.S. territories.
While the Declaration of Independence says that governments derive their power from the consent of the governed, 3.6 million Americans living in U.S. territories are still waiting for that promise to reach them, noted Neil Weare, co-director of Right to Democracy, a nonprofit project that works to advance territory rights.
Thursday’s briefing, What Does “Consent of the Governed” Mean in U.S. Territories?, was organized in coordination with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus and held at the U.S. Senate. Congressman Pablo José Hernández (D-PR) spoke, with Congresswomen Stacey Plaskett (D-VI), Kimberly King-Hinds (R-NMI), and Nydia Velázquez (D-NY) participating via video recording, according to a press release.
The briefing provided members of Congress and their staff with historical background on the current relationship between U.S. territories and the United States through the lens of the Declaration of Independence and the Insular Cases — a century-old legal framework rooted in racial and colonial prejudice — that continues to deny democracy, equity, and self-determination to residents of U.S. territories.
The session “made clear that the question of ‘consent of the governed’ in U.S. territories is not a relic of the past — it is a present reality that affects 3.6 million people every single day. Hearing directly from community leaders across the territories about how unilateral federal decisions shape their lives, their economies, and their environment made one thing undeniable: this undemocratic framework is unsustainable, and the federal government can no longer look away,” said Dr. Adi Martínez-Román, co-director of Right to Democracy. “The U.S. must fulfill its duties under federal and international law and provide the territories with a pathway to self-determination.”
“Two-hundred-and-fifty years ago, the United States rejected colonial rule through the Declaration of Independence, but for 125 years, the Insular Cases have allowed Congress to govern territories without full constitutional rights or self-determination,” added Weare. “It is time for the federal government to recognize colonial rule cannot be squared with the principle of the consent of the governed.”
“Regardless of what your view is on the status of the territories and what their final status should be, we should all be united and we should all present a united front to address the current challenges, and current obstacles, and current inequalities, and current injustices. We should take advantage of the 250th anniversary of the United States to educate the people of the United States about these lingering inequalities and challenges and to work toward solving them once and for all,” said Hernández, who is co-chair of the Territories and Commonwealths Caucus.
“As this nation confronts growing threats to our multiracial democracy, the territories are not a footnote. We are a warning and a road map. We’re living proof of what happens when consent of the governed is made conditional, when constitutional protections are treated as negotiable, when second-class citizenship is sewn into law and dressed up as precedent,” Plaskett said in a video statement. “True democracy and colonialism cannot coexist — not even when that colonialism wears the American flag.”
King-Hinds shared in a video statement that “no American community should be too small or too remote to have its voice respected. As we approach America’s 250th anniversary, we should recommit ourselves to ensuring that the principles of the Declaration of Independence apply equally to all Americans, including those living in the territories.”
“For more than three decades advocating for the people of Puerto Rico and our diaspora, I have said it plainly: the idea that the United States can hold colonies and claim plenary power over millions of people is far too reminiscent of King George III,” said Velázquez in a video statement.
“We cannot let this anniversary pass without using it. It is a real chance to focus on what we have in common and how we move forward together: the people of the territories, our diaspora communities, and our allies in Congress and across the states. And we have to act with the urgency this moment demands. Our Founding Fathers rose to the challenge in front of them; it is on us to rise to ours,” she said.
The briefing also featured testimony from Right to Democracy’s Environment and Democracy Fellows, who shared how federal decisions made without their input impact their communities on a day-to-day basis: María Hernandez, co-director of the Micronesia Climate Change Alliance (Guam); Andra Samoa, community leader and Director of Pacific Global Citizens (American Samoa); Nayda Bobonis, director of Strategic Relations and Advocacy at FURIA Inc. (Puerto Rico); Zeno De Leon Guerrero, board member of the Micronesian Climate Change Alliance (Northern Mariana Island), Imani Daniel, executive director, VIISION and delegate to the Virgin Island’s Sixth Constitutional Convention, and Dr. Sabrina Suluai Mahuka, executive director of Finafinau (American Samoa).
New York Times bestselling author Daniel Immerwahr, author of “How to Hide an Empire,” also presented and highlighted how the failure to recognize the significance of people in U.S. territories is not just a matter of history, but an issue that has ongoing consequences today as the White House considers territorial expansion to places like Greenland.
“People can support democracy, equity, and self-determination in U.S. territories by signing our Declaration to End Colonial Rule in U.S. Territories, which was created alongside Right to Democracy’s Cross-Territorial Coalition,” said Martínez-Román. The declaration is available here.
Financial Advisory Services Higher Education Financing & Bond Issuance RFP TX2026-010
UNIVERSITY OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) RFP TX2026-010 Financial Advisory Services Higher Education Financing & Bond Issuance Issue Date: 6/5/2026 Proposal Due Date: 7/1/2026
- INTRODUCTION
- BACKGROUND
- St. Thomas – Orville E. Kean Campus
- St. Croix – Albert A. Sheen Campus
-
- Revenue bonds
- Public financing programs
- Federal financing programs
- Commercial bank financing
- Capital financing through public/private partnerships
- Debt restructuring or refinancing opportunities
- SCOPE OF SERVICES
3.1 Strategic Financial Advisory
-
- Advise the University on capital financing strategies
- Working capital needs
- Evaluate financing alternatives and funding structures
- Develop financing models and projections
- Assess debt capacity and credit considerations
3.2 Bond Issuance Advisory
Assist the University with planning and execution of bond transactions including:
-
- Revenue bonds
- Tax-exempt or taxable bonds
- Refinancing or refunding bonds
- Other capital market instruments
Services may include:
-
- Structuring and sizing recommendations, timing strategy, and market execution assistance
- Underwriter selection process support, trust agents and placement agents
- Evaluation of financing alternatives (tax-exempt vs taxable, bank loans)
- Credit rating agency strategy, if warranted
- Advisory for periodic reviews monthly/quarterly reporting and project-specific
- Regulatory and disclosure guidance relevant to the University
- Preparing financial projections
- Coordinating with underwriters, bond counsel, and rating agencies
- Supporting preparation of offering documents
3.3 HBCU Capital Financing Program Support
Provide advisory services related to:
-
- Participation in the HBCU Capital Financing Program
- Federal loan program compliance
- Financial modeling and structuring for program participation
3.4 Debt Management & Financial Planning
-
- Review and analyze the University’s existing debt portfolio
- Provide recommendations for refinancing or restructuring where beneficial
- Develop long-term debt management strategies
3.5 Commercial Bank Support
-
- Provide guidance on prospective financing options
- Structure the support needed to address working capital needs and interim financing on capital projects
3.6 Capital Project Financial Modeling
Assist the University with financial feasibility analyses for major projects, including:
-
- Student housing
- Academic buildings
- Infrastructure improvements
- Public-private partnership opportunities
3.7 Transaction Support
Assist the University during financing transactions including:
-
- Coordination with legal counsel, underwriters, and financial institutions
- Rating agencies
- Preparation of financial documentation
- Presentations to governing bodies
- Support during closing and issuance processes
- CONTRACT TERM
The University anticipates awarding a contract for a period of three (3) years, with the option to renew for additional terms based on satisfactory performance and institutional need.
Services will be provided on an as-needed basis during the contract period.
- PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
5.1 Firm Qualifications
-
- Firm overview and history
- Experience providing financial advisory services to higher education institutions
- Experience in providing financial advisory services to higher education institutions that are not rated by any of the rating agencies
- Experience with HBCU institutions
- Experience with rating agencies
- Experience with bond issuances, commercial bank financing and capital financing
5.2 Relevant Experience
Provide descriptions of at least three (3) similar and recent engagements, including:
-
- Institution name
- Type of financing
- Total financing amount
- Services provided
- Year completed
5.3 Proposed Team
Identify the key personnel assigned to this engagement, including:
-
- Lead Financial Advisor(s)
- Supporting analysts
- Relevant experience and qualifications
5.4 Proposed Approach
Describe the firm’s methodology for providing financial advisory services to higher education institutions.
5.5 Fee Structure
Provide a clear description of the proposed fee structure, which may include:
-
- Fixed advisory fees
- Transaction-based fees
- Hourly rates
- Retainer arrangements
The University prefers transparent fee structures with no conflicts of interest.
5.6 References
Provide three (3) client references from higher education institutions.
- EVALUATION CRITERIA
| Criteria | Weight | |
| Firm Experience & Qualifications | 30% | |
| Relevant Higher Education Financing Experience | 25% | |
| Proposed Approach & Methodology | 20% | |
| Team Qualifications | 15% | |
| Cost / Fee Structure | 10% |
- SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
- QUESTIONS
- GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
-
- Reject any or all proposals
- Waive minor informalities in proposals
- Request additional information from proposers
- Negotiate contract terms with the selected firm
All services will be subject to the University’s standard contractual requirements including insurance, indemnification, and compliance provisions.
- CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Proposers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest related to underwriting, financial services, or advisory services that could impact their ability to serve as an independent financial advisor to the University.
- UNIVERSITY COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
-
- Insurance requirements
- Indemnification and hold harmless provisions
- Non-collusion certification
- Conflict of interest disclosure
- Equal opportunity and non-discrimination requirements
- Compliance with applicable federal, territorial, and University policies
- Independent contractor status
- Data confidentiality and records retention
- Audit and access to records
Submission of a proposal constitutes acknowledgment that the proposer is willing to comply with these requirements.
The University reserves the right to require the selected proposer to execute the University’s standard contract terms and conditions prior to commencement of services.
ATTACHMENT APrice Proposal Form Financial Advisory Services
Proposers must complete this pricing sheet and include it with their proposal submission. All pricing must be inclusive of all costs associated with providing the services described in this RFP, unless otherwise noted.- Advisory Fee Structure
| Service | Proposed Fee | Basis (Fixed / Hourly / Transaction-Based) |
| Annual Retainer (if applicable) | $ | |
| Hourly Rate – Senior Advisor | $ | |
| Hourly Rate – Associate / Analyst | $ | |
| Financial Modeling / Analysis | $ | |
| Capital Financing Advisory | $ |
- Bond Transaction Advisory Fees
| Financing Type | Proposed Fee Structure |
| Bond Issuance Advisory | |
| Bond Refunding / Refinancing | |
| Debt Restructuring | |
| Public-Private Partnership Financing |
- Additional Expenses
| Expense Type | Cost |
| Travel | |
| Document Preparation | |
| Other (Specify) |
- Certification
Insurance Brokerage Services RFP TX2026-011
UNIVERSITY OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) RFP TX2026-011 INSURANCE BROKERAGE SERVICES Issue Date: 6/5/2026 Proposal Due Date: 7/1/2026
- INTRODUCTION
The University of the Virgin Islands (UVI) invites qualified firms to submit proposals to provide comprehensive insurance brokerage and risk management advisory services for the University. The selected broker will act as the University’s insurance advisor and representative in the insurance marketplace, assisting with establishing insured amounts, policy placement, risk evaluation, claims advisory, and strategic insurance program development.
The University seeks a broker with extensive experience serving higher education institutions or large public sector organizations, capable of advising on complex insurance programs and operating in geographically dispersed locations.
- UNIVERSITY BACKGROUND
The University of the Virgin Islands is a public historically black university (HBCU) with campuses located on St. Croix (Albert A. Sheen Campus) and St. Thomas (Orville E. Kean Campus).
UVI operates a wide range of academic, research, housing, and public service facilities including:-
- Academic buildings
- Student housing
- Research laboratories
- Agricultural facilities
- Marine and environmental research programs
- Athletic facilities
- Administrative offices
- OBJECTIVE
-
- Provide professional brokerage services
- Market insurance programs competitively
- Identify competitive insurance markets
- Advise on risk management strategies
- Assist with claims coordination
- Ensure adequate coverage at competitive pricing
- SCOPE OF SERVICES
4.1 Insurance Program Review
-
- Evaluate the University’s current insurance program and exposure
- Review existing policies, endorsements, limits, deductibles, and coverage gaps
- Recommend improvements to coverage structure and limits
4.2 Insurance Market Placement
-
- Market insurance policies to qualified carriers and markets
- Obtain competitive proposals from reputable insurers
- Present coverage options and pricing comparisons
- Assist in negotiating favorable terms and conditions
4.3 Coverage Types
The broker must be capable of placing and managing policies including but not limited to:
-
- Property Insurance
- General Liability
- Automobile Liability
- Professional Liability
- Cyber Liability
- Directors & Officers Liability
- Employment Practices Liability
- Builder’s Risk
- Environmental Liability
- Excess/Umbrella Liability
4.4 Risk Management Advisory
Provide advisory services related to:
-
- Enterprise risk management
- Risk mitigation measures and strategies
- Contractual risk transfer
- Insurance requirements for vendors and contractors
- Safety and loss prevention programs
4.5 Claims Support
-
- Assist the University in reporting and managing claims
- Coordinate with insurers during the claims process
- Provide claims tracking and status reporting
- Advocate for the University in claim resolution
4.6 Annual Insurance Renewal
-
- Conduct annual renewal marketing
- Provide renewal strategy recommendations
- Deliver renewal reports summarizing coverage and pricing options
4.7 Reporting
Provide regular reporting including:
-
- Insurance program summaries
- Market analysis
- Claims activity reports
- Risk exposure updates
- CONTRACT TERM
The anticipated contract term will be: Three (3) years, with the option for two (2) additional one-year renewals, subject to satisfactory performance and mutual agreement.
- PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
6.1 Firm Qualifications
-
- Firm overview and history
- Years of experience in insurance brokerage
- Experience with universities or public institutions
- Organizational structure and staffing
6.2 Relevant Experience
Provide at least three (3) references for clients of similar size or complexity.
Include:
-
- Organization name
- Contact person
- Description of services provided
- Length of engagement
6.3 Key Personnel
Provide resumes and roles for personnel assigned to the account.
6.4 Service Approach
Describe the firm’s approach to:
-
- Insurance placement
- Risk management advisory
- Claims support
- Renewal strategy
6.5 Compensation Structure
Proposers must disclose their compensation method, including:
-
- Commission-based compensation
- Fee-based compensation
- Any other remuneration received from insurers
- EVALUATION CRITERIA
| Evaluation Factor | Weight |
| Experience with Similar Institutions | 25% |
| Qualifications of Key Personnel | 20% |
| Proposed Service Approach | 25% |
| Compensation Structure | 15% |
| References | 15% |
- PROPOSAL SUBMISSION
Procurement Office
bids@uvi.edu
Subject Line: RFP TX2026-011 – INSURANCE BROKERAGE SERVICES
Submissions must include:
-
-
- Technical Proposal
- Compensation Disclosure
- References
-
- QUESTIONS
Taylor Gilmore, Procurement Office University of the Virgin Islands Email: bids@uvi.edu
Responses to questions will be distributed to all known proposers.- GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
-
- Insurance requirements
- Indemnification provisions
- Compliance with applicable federal and territorial laws
- Non-discrimination requirements
- Conflict of interest disclosure
-
- Reject any or all proposals
- Request clarifications or additional information
- Cancel the solicitation at any time
- Negotiate with the selected proposer
- LOCAL VENDOR PREFERENCE
Consistent with UVI procurement policies, preference may be given to qualified vendors located in the U.S. Virgin Islands, provided that pricing and qualifications are competitive.




