
Enormous Hybrid Cat On The Loose

Family of Student Injured by Falling Ceiling Fan Sues Education Dept., Contractor

The parents of a St. Croix Educational Complex student who was injured last year when an industrial ceiling fan fell during class sued the V.I. Education Department, the territory’s government and the contractor who installed the fan.
According to a lawsuit filed in V.I. Superior Court this week, the student and his family suffered a personal injury, disfigurement, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life and medical expenses, and they are seeking compensation “for his serious, severe, disabling and permanent injuries.”
Images of the student’s injury circulated widely on social media at the time and sparked widespread outrage and even protests over the condition of the territory’s public schools. The following week, the Education Department said it had suspended K&J Services, the contractor who had installed the fans, from future work with VIDE. In their complaint, the student’s family claimed that K&J “installed the industrial ceiling fan contrary to the industry standards” and that they “were not licensed and authorized to perform the work that they were contracted to perform” for the Education Department.
The family further claimed that the Education Department “negligently” failed to vet the contractor and that it “recklessly compounded its due diligence failure by failing to properly supervise and inspect the work being done to install the industrial ceiling fans.”
Though all 17 of the ceiling fans K&J installed throughout the St. Croix Educational Complex were removed, maintenance issues have persisted in many of the territory’s schools. Complex — along with St. Croix Central High School and the Career and Technical Education Center — began the 2025-2026 school year with an altered schedule due to incomplete air conditioning work. The John H. Woodson Junior High School opened weeks later while contractors completed roof repairs and mold remediation.
St. Croix Construction Company Polluting Cane Garden Bay, EPA Says

USVI’s Smith and Simpson Make Their Mark in Tokyo World Athletics Championships



Text Service Launches to Spread Hope as Caribbean Volunteer Services Prepares for Survivors of Suicide Loss Day
Caribbean Volunteer Services, Inc. has launched Speak Life VI — Your Lifeline of Encouragement, a text-based service delivering short messages of hope, encouragement, and resources directly to Virgin Islanders. The nonprofit introduced the service Monday and will expand next month to include multiple weekly messages in English, Spanish, and Haitian Creole, a press release announced.
“Our goal is simple: be a steady voice for a stronger us,” said Laurie Christian, founder of Caribbean Volunteer Services and former Teen Line Program Director. “Back in 2010, while directing the Teen Hotline at Lutheran Social Services, I connected with Dr. Aletha Baumann and the UVI Psychology Club to co-sponsor the very first Survivors of Suicide Loss Day in the Virgin Islands. That partnership helped root the event in our community. Speak Life VI is the next step in that same commitment — making sure every resident has access to encouragement, connection, and hope.”
The text service is also part of CVS’s preparations for the 2025 International Survivors of Suicide Loss Day, set for Saturday, Nov. 22, at Frederiksted Beach. The event will feature a sunset candlelighting ceremony to honor lives lost to suicide, followed by a community gathering with dinner and drinks available for purchase. A guest speaker will be announced in the coming weeks, according to the press release.
CVS has a long history of hosting the observance, adapting during the COVID-19 pandemic by moving the event online to ensure accessibility. Last year’s program, themed “Sunset Waves of Reflection, Resilience, and Renewal,” featured licensed psychologist Dr. Sophia Joseph Parrilla, who delivered a message of healing that resonated deeply with attendees, the press release stated.
Residents can opt in to Speak Life VI by texting LIFE to 877-717-1540. More information is available on the Caribbean Volunteer Services Facebook page.
Trevor Augustine Aldridge Dies

Elder Justice Summit: Safeguarding Older Virgin Islanders
“Caregiving is a natural part of the cycle of life. We begin our life journeys requiring caregiving, then broaden into self-care, transition into self-care while caring for others and ultimately require individually focused caregiving as we expand into our senior years. At the core of the caregiving journey is an ever-evolving cycle of balancing self-care and caring for others,” stated Dr. Migdalia Brathwaite, host of AARP VI’s four-part workshop series Caring for the Caregiver.
Caring for the Caregiver will walk you through the journey of the caregiving cycle. Day One will focus on the transition into becoming a caregiver, the internal narratives that support the transition, managing multiple caregiver networks and the importance of self-awareness in the caregiving journey. Day Two uses simple symbols to explore the complexity of finding the right balance in managing quality care for loved ones. Day Three explores recognizing the need for self-care as a caregiver, the misconception of the need to be an extraordinary caregiver and identifying other stressors such as compassion fatigue, loneliness and recognizing forgiveness as a self-care resource. Day Four explores what’s next in life after the caregiving journey has culminated and looks at the work of transitioning into new roles and creating brave new stories. For more information and registration:
https://states.aarp.org/virgin-islands/caring-for-the-caregiver-workshops-aarp-vi-trainingseries
AARP VI understands that some caregivers need more than a virtual experience; they need an in-person human connection. On September 29th, from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m., AARP VI and the VI Department of Human Services will collaborate to host the third component of their Elder Justice Summit: Safeguarding Older Virgin Islanders, Supporting Caregivers. This event will be held at My Brother’s Workshop Campus, St. Thomas, VI (behind Home Depot).
This powerful session is designed for caregivers and the older adults they care for, focusing on the impact of elder abuse and exploitation on both sides of the caregiving relationship—and, most importantly, how to stop and prevent it.
Featured Presentations:
• Shelby King Gaddy, Esq., Executive Director, Legal Services of the Virgin Islands – Safeguarding Legal Documents
• Risk Manager, First Bank Virgin Islands – Bank Safe: Protecting Your Finances
• Jessica Whyte, MA, LPC, NCC, Licensed Professional Counselor – The Emotional Side of Caregiving and Being Cared For
The summit will explore the emotional and psychological dimensions of caregiving, acknowledge the challenges and vulnerabilities caregivers and care recipients face, and share practical strategies to build resilience, protection, and compassion in elder care.
Breakfast and lunch will be provided. For more information and registration:
https://states.aarp.org/virgin-islands/aarp-vi-and-the-vi-department-of-human-servicescollaborate-to-host-the-third-component-of-their-elder-justice-summit-safeguardingolder-virgin-islanders-supporting-caregivers
Over 100 million Americans are 50 and older, including over 22,000 in the Virgin Islands. As the community ages, more adult children step into the role of caregiver. Learning and growing as a caregiver is an ongoing responsibility, and the caregiver’s self-care can be overlooked or buried beneath an avalanche of scheduled responsibilities. The question, “What about me?” can often be viewed as a luxury item when continued support is necessary. Discovering when to take time for self-care is a skill that requires development and must resonate at the heart of all caregivers. Taking time for self-care may be challenged by several barriers, including limiting beliefs, adjusting to role reversals and implementing new structures for caring. Caregiving can also contribute to behavioral health concerns such as burnout, negative self-talk, depression, compassion fatigue and loneliness. In short, the journey of caregiving is a uniquely personal experience. AARP VI understands the necessity of supporting caregivers across the territory and invites caregivers and those facing transition into the caregiving role to participate in these free educational and interactive events. V.I. Judge Denies New York Times Request for Epstein Estate Reports

A V.I. Superior Court judge this week denied a request from The New York Times to unseal reports related to the estate of Jeffrey Epstein, noting that the court already deemed the records confidential in 2020 and that unsealing them now “would jeopardize innocent third parties.”
“The facts have not changed over the last five years,” V.I. Magistrate Judge Simone Van Holton-Turnbull wrote in an order signed Tuesday. “This case is still of immense public interest. Considering recent news media events, the case is at the most intense public interest since Mr. Epstein’s passing. The need to protect third parties from undue harassment, in particular the need to protect victims that were minors at the time, is thereby even greater than when the Estate’s motion was originally granted.”
Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to charges of procuring a child for prostitution and soliciting a prostitute as part of a sweetheart deal with federal prosecutors for which he only served 13 months in prison with work release. He was arrested again in 2019 and charged with sex trafficking minors. He died in a New York City jail cell that year in what the city’s medical examiner called a suicide by hanging.
The case attracted immediate and sustained international interest because of Epstein’s prior conviction, the scope of his alleged abuses and his associations with high-profile and wealthy people. The case also drew attention to the U.S. Virgin Islands, where Epstein received some $300 million in tax breaks from the territory’s Economic Development Commission while operating a web of shell companies from his primary residence on Little St. James.
New York Times reporter Matthew Goldstein first appealed to the court in June to unseal all seven reports compiled by the court-appointed special master reviewing Epstein’s estate.
“I believe these reports should be public because they contain critical information about the finances of the Epstein estate and are one way for the media, the public and Epstein’s nearly 200 victims to make sure that the estate is being properly liquidated and money is going to the appropriate places,” he wrote. “It is also another way for the public to best learn where Epstein had invested his money.”
Goldstein and The New York Times followed up their request on July 31 through local attorney Kevin Rames, who argued that the reports had been sealed “without any justification.”
The coexecutors of Epstein’s estate responded in August and argued that unsealing the reports would “subject those who have already transacted business with the Estate to harassment and threats” and would “deter others from transacting with the Estate as its assets continue to be administered.”
“Professional reporters and self-styled ‘internet sleuths’ alike scrutinize even routine administrative actions by the Estate,” they wrote. “As a result individuals and third-party vendors who may have never met Mr. Epstein but who have been identified as transacting with the Estate are subject to harassment and threats.”
Van Holton-Turnbull acknowledged the immense public interest in the case but wrote that the danger to third parties — and Epstein’s victims in particular — “is too great.”
“In an age where one’s personal information can become forever present and findable, whether by accidental posting or malicious and perverse intent, it is evermore imperative for Courts to protect sensitive details from prying eyes — especially when said details involves the sexual exploitation [sic],” she wrote. “By unsealing the requested documents, this Court finds that nothing but unnecessary pain awaits those within.”
The New York Times has asked the court to weigh in on Epstein-related documents before. In 2021, the newspaper sued the V.I. Economic Development Authority and its chief executive, Wayne Biggs Jr., for information related to Epstein’s Southern Trust Company. In that case, The New York Times said it failed to respond to an Open Records Act request for the company’s: income tax returns; audited financial statements; applications for tax incentives; company records supplied to the V.I. attorney general; related correspondence; and compliance reports prepared by Economic Development Commission staff.
Local attorney Kevin D’Amour wrote at the time that Biggs’s failure to comply with the local public records law is “unsound” and “not properly grounded in applicable law.” The New York Times later moved to dismiss its claims against the Virgin Islands Government in 2021 and against Biggs in 2022.
Separately, the newspaper is continuing to seek Epstein’s financial records sealed by the U.S. District Court of Southern New York as part of the Virgin Islands Government’s lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase, which was settled in 2023 for $75 million.
Goldstein wrote to Senior U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff last month that some of the 300 exhibits the territory filed in 2023 contained financial statements related to accounts either controlled by Epstein or by his victims. Attorneys for JPMorgan and the territory responded three weeks ago, noting which of the exhibits they believe should remain sealed or redacted to protect the victims’ identities or “confidential supervisory information.” Rakoff has yet to rule on the matter.
U.S. DOJ Argues Right to Appeal Death Penalty Decision in Dangleben Case
The U.S. Justice Department said in a filing Wednesday that it does have the right to pursue an interlocutory appeal of a V.I. District Court order striking the death penalty in the murder case of Richardson Dangleben Jr., which the defense has argued the Third Circuit Court of Appeals should dismiss on jurisdictional and other grounds.
Barring dismissal, V.I. Public Defender Matthew Campbell asked in an emergency motion filed Friday that the appeal be expedited, given that Dangleben is set to stand trial starting Oct. 6 for the murder of V.I. Police Detective Delberth Phipps Jr. in July 2023 on St. Thomas.
The V.I. Justice Department initially filed a “no-seek” notice in February 2024, but reversed course in May after the Trump administration issued an executive order saying it would review all decisions not to seek the death penalty in eligible cases charged during the Biden administration, including Dangleben’s.
Campbell opposed the sudden about-face and, after briefing by both sides, V.I. District Court Chief Judge Robert Molloy struck the government’s notice of intent to seek the death penalty from the record in August, ordering that the case proceed as a non-capital case. In a Sept. 15 memorandum opinion explaining his decision, he cited a number of concerns, including the fact that the DOJ’s notice came more than a year after it said it would not seek capital punishment, was not based on new information not previously available to the government, was filed 22 months after Dangleben’s initial arrest, 19 months after his first indictment, and less than five months before trial.
Adam Sleeper, acting U.S. Attorney for the District of the Virgin Islands, filed a notice of appeal the same day and on Sept. 18, Third Circuit Clerk Patricia S. Dodszuweit advised that the case was listed for possible dismissal “due to jurisdictional defect” and gave the government until noon Wednesday to respond to Campbell’s emergency motion.
William A. Glaser of the DOJ’s Criminal Division in Washington, D.C., complied with that order, arguing in a response filed at 8:42 a.m. that the Third Circuit does have jurisdiction and that the appeal needn’t be expedited because it is unlikely Dangleben’s trial is going to start Oct. 6 anyway as the government’s notice of appeal from a Sept. 9 oral order dismissing two non-capital counts of the indictment is not due until Oct. 9, or three days after the trial is set to start.
“Dangleben argues that this Court lacks jurisdiction over the government’s noticed appeal. He is incorrect. Should the Solicitor General choose to pursue an appeal in this case, this Court has jurisdiction over this appeal under 18 U.S.C. § 3731 or, in the alternative, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and the collateral order doctrine,” Glaser wrote in his 15-page response to Campbell’s emergency motion.
Five courts of appeal to consider the question have held that § 3731 — which governs appellate reviews of decisions in federal criminal cases — authorizes a government appeal from an order striking a notice of intent to seek the death penalty, said Glaser. “Contrary to Dangleben’s contention, it does not matter that § 3731 does not specifically mention ‘a Government appeal from a pre-trial order striking a notice of intent to seek death.’ … Striking a death notice is indistinguishable from ‘dismissing an indictment’ as to ‘one or more counts, or any part thereof.’”
By striking the government’s notice of intent to seek the death penalty on Count One, “the district court dismissed from the indictment the offense of capital using and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence resulting in death … while leaving the non-capital version of that offense in place,” he said.
Moreover, an appeal while the case has not concluded, which Campbell framed as highly unusual, is the government’s only remedy, said Glaser.
“The government likely could not challenge the order striking the death-penalty notice in an appeal from a final judgment. If the case proceeded to a non-capital trial and Dangleben is convicted, the Double Jeopardy Clause ordinarily would bar the government from retrying Dangleben for the capital version of the same crimes in a second trial,” he said.
Only if Dangleben himself obtained reversal of his (non-capital) convictions on grounds other than sufficiency of the evidence could the government seek to retry him for a capital offense, said Glaser, citing Burks v. United States. “Thus, absent a successful appeal by Dangleben himself, the government could not obtain any relief on appeal from a final judgment. This Court should follow the lead of five other circuits in determining that an order striking a death-penalty notice is appealable under § 3731.”
However, even if the court lacked jurisdiction under § 3731, the order would still be appealable under § 1291 and the collateral order doctrine, he said. The Supreme Court has recognized “a ‘small class’ of collateral rulings that, although they do not end the litigation, are appropriately deemed ‘final,’” which is the case here, he said.
As for expediting the appeal, the case is complex and would “ordinarily prompt extension requests from both sides,” he said, but the defense has indicated that it stands by the proposed schedule set forth in its emergency motion and will be ready for trial Oct. 6.
“Because the parties are unable to reach agreement, the United States proposes that briefing proceed with the ordinary deadlines applicable to criminal cases, with the opening brief due 30 days after the record is complete, the response brief due 21 days after service of the opening brief, and any reply brief due 21 days after service of the response brief,” Glaser wrote.
As for Dangleben’s contention that expedited review is necessary based on his speedy-trial rights and the psychological anguish of the uncertainty surrounding his punishment if he is convicted, this “is a serious criminal case involving the discharge of a firearm during a crime of violence resulting in death that, until the district court’s order, was noticed as a death-penalty case. Cases of this type ordinarily take time and are not well-served by hasty deadlines, especially the days-long deadlines that Dangleben requests,” said Glaser.
Plaskett Pursuing App-Free Parcel Problem Solution





