
Georgiana Farrell Dies

Beatrice Neptune-Wallace Dies

James F. White Sr. Dies

Op-Ed: Virgin Islands at a Crossroads, Part V: The Superpower of the U.S. Virgin Islands and Why Our Strategic Location Matters Today

Every society has a defining strength that shapes its place in the world. For the U.S. Virgin Islands, that defining strength has always been our location. It is our superpower. At the crossroads of the Americas, the Caribbean Sea, and the Atlantic Ocean, our islands occupy one of the most strategically significant positions on the planet. That advantage shaped why the United States acquired the Virgin Islands more than a century ago, and today it is the foundation of a new opportunity that we cannot afford to ignore.
As global markets shift, supply chains reorganize, and nations compete for technological leadership, the strategic value of the Virgin Islands is more relevant than ever in our history. The world is being rewired, and our geographic position places us at the center of that transformation. A Strategic Advantage Recognized Since 1917 In 1917, the United States purchased the Virgin Islands from Denmark for $25 million in gold. This was no accident of history. It was a deliberate response to two defining strategic concerns. 1. Protecting the Panama Canal The Panama Canal, opened just three years earlier, had instantly become the backbone of American military mobility and global trade. The United States recognized that securing the surrounding Caribbean region was crucial to its defense and commercial interests. St. Thomas, with its deep and naturally protected harbor, offered an ideal location for refueling, naval operations, and maritime surveillance. 2. Preventing German Expansion in the Caribbean During World War I, U.S. leaders feared that Germany might acquire the Virgin Islands from Denmark and establish a base dangerously close to both the Panama Canal and the U.S. East Coast. Purchasing the Virgin Islands eliminated that risk and strengthened America’s presence in the Western Hemisphere. This history makes one point clear. Our geographic position has always been our most valuable asset. Why Our Strategic Location Matters Even More Today What made the Virgin Islands valuable in 1917 makes us even more valuable in 2025. The global marketplace is being reshaped by forces such as digital connectivity, energy security, supply chain consolidation, and geopolitical competition. Our location gives us a front-row seat to all of them. 1. A Maritime Crossroads for Modern Trade The Virgin Islands sit along major shipping routes that connect the Gulf Coast, the Eastern Seaboard, the Panama Canal, and South America. As companies nearshore and reshore supply chains to reduce risks and shorten delivery times, our Territory can emerge as a logistics, storage, and maritime services hub within a U.S. jurisdiction. 2. A Growing Digital Gateway The modern economy flows through fiber-optic cables rather than shipping containers. The Caribbean is becoming an essential digital corridor that connects the Americas, Europe, and West Africa. With deep-water conditions and U.S. regulatory stability, the Virgin Islands are well-positioned to host subsea cable landings, data centers, cloud connectivity, and cybersecurity operations. This creates a pathway to high-wage technology careers and a new pillar of economic development. 3. A Platform for Clean Energy Leadership The Territory has abundant solar resources and is receiving significant federal investment. This combination creates an opportunity to build one of the most reliable and resilient clean energy systems in the Caribbean. A modern power grid strengthens economic competitiveness and supports technology-driven industries. 4. A Forward Position for U.S. Interests in a Competitive Region Even without a large naval base today, the U.S. Virgin Islands remain an important location for maritime domain awareness, border security, disaster response, and the protection of telecommunications and energy infrastructure. As global powers increase their influence in the Caribbean, the Virgin Islands anchors American presence and regional stability. Turning Strategic Value Into Economic Growth The superpower of the Virgin Islands opens the door to real economic transformation through:- Digital infrastructure and cloud services
- Subsea cable landings and data center development
- Renewable energy and microgrid innovation
- Logistics and nearshoring support
- Workforce training in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and clean technology
- Tourism diversification based on culture, sustainability, and innovation
These opportunities can help the Virgin Islands evolve from a tourism-dependent economy into a diversified and globally connected hub.
Conclusion: A Moment We Cannot Miss
The superpower of the U.S. Virgin Islands has always been our location. It shaped why the United States acquired our islands in 1917, and it explains why our value today is extraordinary. In a global marketplace defined by data flows, energy transition, and supply chain realignment, the Virgin Islands are not a remote outpost. We are a gateway to the future.
The question we face is not whether we possess strategic value. It is whether we will use this superpower to build a resilient, competitive, and prosperous economy for generations to come.
The opportunity is here. The world is changing. The Virgin Islands are again at a crossroads.
This piece is part of the “Virgin Islands at a Crossroads” series, which invites Virgin Islanders at home and abroad to join the conversation on building a resilient, diversified future. Read the first four parts of the series here: Op-ed: Virgin Islands at a Crossroads: Act Now or Miss the Next Global Economic Wave Op-ed: Virgin Islands at a Crossroads, Part II: Anchoring the AI Economy at the Digital Gateway of the Americas Op-ed: Virgin Islands at a Crossroads, Part III: Building the Workforce of the AI and Diversified Clean Energy Economy— Bernard Dyer is a Virgin Islander in the diaspora, technologist, and strategist with more than 25 years of public-sector experience, including 17 years with Booz Allen Hamilton supporting large-scale digital transformation and system consolidation initiatives in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. He is also a monthly co-host on WSTX AM 970 radio’s Community Digest, where he has been for the last 16 years, highlighting new ideas and best practices to help build a more diversified and sustainable Virgin Islands economy.
Editor’s Note: Opinion articles do not represent the views of the Virgin Islands Source newsroom and are the sole expressed opinion of the writer. Submissions can be made to visource@gmail.com.
Freshwater Fish, Shrimp, and Crab In The Guts Of The USVI Seminar

Waste Management Authority Holiday Hours
Regular business operations will resume on Monday, Dec. 1.
The VIWMA team extends its best wishes for a safe and enjoyable Thanksgiving.
For more information, contact the Division of Education and Communications Management at 340-474-2811 or email communications@viwma.org. Stay connected with us on Facebook, LinkedIn, and X for updates. Buccaneers Defeat Florida National in Wire-to-Wire 80-63 Victory

Martinez, O’Neal Ready for Trial Next Week, Though Some Issues Remain
Attorneys for former V.I. Police commissioner Ray Martinez and former Office of Management and Budget director Jenifer O’Neal said during a final pre-trial conference Monday that they are ready to proceed to trial Dec. 3 on federal wire fraud and bribery charges, though issues remain to be resolved, including what evidence may be introduced about the extensive criminal background of the government’s key witness.
V.I. District Court Judge Mark Kearney said he would take the last-minute motion to introduce David Whitaker’s long felony history, filed Friday by Martinez’s attorneys, under advisement but admonished them for missing the Nov. 4 deadline for all final pretrial motions — including to admit or preclude evidence.
“Why the delay? This is pretty well-known stuff. … I mean, it takes about half a second on a Google search to find out about Mr. Whitaker,” he said. “Is the answer that ‘I’m a busy guy’? Is that the answer? ‘I didn’t get to this’?” Kearney asked Miguel Oppenheimer, who is Martinez’s court-appointed attorney along with Juan F. Matos de Juan, both of Puerto Rico.
While Whitaker’s criminal background has been widely reported, including by the Source, Oppenheimer said his office only realized the extent of it as they began preparing for trial in earnest two weeks ago. Once an FBI background check confirmed the information they were finding online, they filed the motion to admit Whitaker’s prior convictions beyond the usual 10-year time limit.
Claiming that “your investigator just found out is not good cause. Give me a better reason,” Kearney said, especially as the issue was addressed in the recent federal bribery trial of former Sports, Parks and Recreation commissioner Calvert White, where Whitaker was a key government witness, and in the U.S. Justice Department’s trial memorandum of Oct. 15, which outlined the case against Martinez and O’Neal and estimated Whitaker will testify for eight to 10 hours.
A jury found White and co-defendant Benjamin Hendricks guilty of honest services wire fraud and bribery in late July after a weeklong trial in the U.S. District Court on St. Thomas. Sentencing is set for Jan. 22.The government filed its opposition to Martinez’s motion Sunday, calling it untimely and noting that convictions “more than 10 years old are presumptively inadmissible to impeach a testifying witness. For the conviction to be admissible, the court must decide that the probative value ‘substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect.’”
Moreover, “the government has no intention of presenting the cooperating witness, Whitaker, ‘as a man who should be trusted,’” it said. “In fact, the government has charged the witness for the same crimes charged in this case, along with two additional, unrelated fraud schemes.”
Martinez and O’Neal are each charged with five counts of honest services wire fraud, which each carry a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison; one count of federal program bribery, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years; and one count of money laundering conspiracy, which carries a maximum penalty of 20 years, according to the U.S. Justice Department. Martinez is also charged with two counts of obstruction of justice, which each carry a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison.
An indictment unsealed in January alleges the pair accepted bribes from then-government contractor turned FBI informant Whitaker, who subsequently admitted to two counts of wire fraud and one count of bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds in a plea deal with prosecutors unsealed in September 2024. His sentencing is currently scheduled for June 10, 2026.
In January, Martinez filed a civil suit against Whitaker in V.I. Superior Court, alleging entrapment, which raised another question at Monday’s conference: Whether Martinez intends to pursue that as a defense.
“My understanding of entrapment means that you’re admitting that you’ve committed the offense,” but it was due to the government’s actions, said O’Neal’s attorney, Dale Smith. “If that is the case, then we don’t have antagonistic effects.”
However, if that is not what he is claiming, O’Neal’s defense could be antagonistic to Martinez, in which case she should go first at trial, even though Martinez is named first on the indictment, said Smith. That way Martinez will have an opportunity “to answer some of the things that I am going to argue on behalf of my client,” he said.
“If I take a position about the evidence in the case and what it means, that adversely impacts the co-defendant, if he has gone first he won’t be able to address it if I go second,” Smith told the judge.
Oppenheimer said that while he did not have an immediate position on Smith’s request, he added that he prefers to go first at trial.
“I’m not going to rule on that today. This is something the lawyers should be able to work out. Whatever happens, it’s going to be the same way throughout [the trial]. We’re not switching it up. You’re not saying, O’Neal will go first today, Martinez will go first tomorrow. It’s going to be the same way all along. So, you can certainly let me know and file a notice if you wish,” Kearney told Smith.
The trial is set to begin at 8:30 a.m. Dec. 3 in District Court on St. Thomas with jury selection and opening arguments and will resume at 8:30 a.m. Dec. 4 when the government will call its first witness. U.S. Justice Department trial attorney Alexandre Dempsey said Monday that the government expects to wrap up its case by Dec. 10, not Dec. 16 as was previously estimated.
School Administrator Accused of Child Sexual Abuse Makes Appearance in Court
The school administrator charged with sexually abusing a student at a St. Thomas elementary school appeared for an initial hearing in Superior Court on Monday. The judge began by saying that part of the advice of rights hearing had already been completed before the formalities began.
Superior Court Magistrate Judge Paula Norkaitis read off the charges against Assistant Principal Clifton Boyd and said that because he was arrested on a warrant, probable cause had already been established. Boyd is charged with aggravated first-degree rape of a minor under the age of 13, unlawful sexual contact, and child abuse.
Boyd appeared at Monday’s hearing by way of live stream video from the Bureau of Corrections, unshaven and wearing an orange jumpsuit.
An investigation by the VIPD Domestic Violence and Special Victims Unit began in August when a high school student at the Ivanna Eudora Kean High School told authorities he had been assaulted by Boyd when he was attending Joseph Gomez Elementary School. At the time of the alleged assault, the student said he was in fifth or sixth grade.
Subsequent encounters between the complainant and the defendant led to explicit sex acts behind a locked door in the principal’s office, court documents said.
After hearing the account of an alleged sexual assault, the Kean High School official notified an administrator who, in turn, alerted police and the Department of Human Services.
“… As part of this investigation, law enforcement subpoenaed records from the Virgin Islands Department of Education. The Department of Education has produced multiple documents, confirming that Boyd was assigned as assistant principal at Joseph Gomez Elementary School when (the complainant) was enrolled as a fifth grader during the 2019-2020 school year,” read a statement included in an affidavit produced by investigators.
The most serious charges carry a potential maximum sentence of life in prison, Norkaitis said. Assistant Attorney General Brenda Scales asked the court to increase Boyd’s bail from $500,000 to $1 million, but the judge decided not to.
“We’re asking that the court consider the type of charges he is facing,” Scales said. “This is to protect the children.”
Although the charges are serious and the defendant is considered a danger to the community, Norkaitis said Boyd had no prior brushes with law enforcement and had sufficient personal assets to secure his bail.
But the judge added that allowing the defendant pretrial release on a 10 percent cash bond was not appropriate.
Boyd’s next court appearance — an arraignment — was scheduled for Dec. 12. Norkaitis accepted the request by Sharon Boyd, the defendant’s wife, to serve as a third-party custodian if the bail conditions are enough to allow for a pretrial release.
In past cases of a similar nature, federal authorities have stepped in to successfully prosecute offenders charged with child sexual abuse in the V.I. public school system. On Monday, Attorney General Gordon Rhea was asked if this case might wind up in federal hands.
“The V.I. Department of Justice is working in close cooperation with the VIPD and the V.I. Department of Education to support the full investigation of child sexual abuse in V.I. public schools. At present, this is primarily a local investigation led by the VIPD Criminal Investigations Bureau, with support by our federal partners, including conducting interviews and securing documents. This investigation is ongoing,” Rhea said.
“As detectives develop evidence sufficient for probable cause, victims may be brought by the V.I. Department of Justice for local prosecution.”
The attorney general also appealed to the public to assist in whatever way they can by calling the CRIMESTOPPERS VI at 1-800-222-8477.
“Citizen tips are anonymous and are critical to the ongoing investigation,” he said.






