Dear Source:
I may be inactive in the VI Bar, but I don't think that it is a defendant's obligation to prove innocence. The case was dismissed for lack of evidence the last time, and the government admits it has no new evidence. So what is going on here?
Mary Weber
Aiken, S.C.
Editor's note: We welcome and encourage readers to keep the dialogue going by responding to Source commentary. Letters should be e-mailed with name and place of residence to visource@gmail.com.